Home > Successful Claim Advice > Forcing Disclosure of Information

Forcing Disclosure of Information

By: J.A.J Aaronson - Updated: 8 Sep 2012 | comments*Discuss
 
Forcing Disclosure Information

The disclosure of information is of particular importance for the progress of a successful occupational health and safety compensation claim. The legal concept of ‘discovery and inspection’ is a fundamental part of most civil cases, as it offers the plaintiff the opportunity to use, for the purposes of evidence, documents held by the defendant that may be of use to their case. On the other hand, it also offers the defendant a chance to attempt to keep particularly sensitive documents under wraps.

Importance to a Claim

The type of documents that might be used in a civil case will illustrate the importance of disclosure of information. In the case of an occupational injury, the plaintiff will almost certainly wish to see copies of internal safety records, or details of previous complaints. Such documents can prove vital to the case.

Similarly, the plaintiff is likely to wish to produce documents of their own; for example, details of lost earnings sustained since the accident, or statements made by their doctor or other medical professional regarding the extent of their injuries.

There are two ways in which documents may be disclosed. It is perfectly possible that it will not be necessary for the plaintiff to force disclosure; when the respondent receives notification that legal action is beginning against them, they must present a list of documents to the plaintiff within fourteen days. This list should include: those documents relevant to the complaint and which the defendant has no objection to producing; documents relevant to the case which the defendant refuses to produce; and documents relevant to the case to which the defendant does not currently have access.

Forcing Disclosure

It is perfectly possible, however, that the respondent will return a list that is unsatisfactory to the plaintiff – for example if the plaintiff objects to the defendant’s refusal to produce certain documents. Similarly, while a respondent may produce a satisfactory list, forcing disclosure may be necessary if they refuse to abide by it.

If it becomes necessary to force disclosure, this must be done through the courts. The complaining party must make an application for a court order to force the other party to disclose the relevant documents. The application must include details of why the documents are relevant to the case, and details of why they should be entitled to view them.

Frequently, a refusal to disclose relevant documents can be disastrous for a case; for example, if a defendant fails to make these documents available then a judge may file a judgment against them by default. Similarly, if the plaintiff fails to disclose then the case may be thrown out.

Privileged Documents

It should be noted that there are certain documents to which parties may have no right of access. Neither the complainant nor the defendant is required to produce documents that may incriminate them (although this is unlikely unless you find yourself working for a particularly unscrupulous organisation!). Similarly, certain documents are known as ‘privileged’ and are therefore exempt. This applies most frequently to documents which it is found to be against the public interest to produce. Again, this is an unlikely situation but one that should be borne in mind.

Related Articles in the 'Successful Claim Advice' Category...
Share Your Story, Join the Discussion or Seek Advice..
Why not be the first to leave a comment for discussion, ask for advice or share your story...

If you'd like to ask a question one of our experts (workload permitting) or a helpful reader hopefully can help you... We also love comments and interesting stories

Title:
(never shown)
Firstname:
(never shown)
Surname:
(never shown)
Email:
(never shown)
Nickname:
(shown)
Comment:
Validate:
Enter word:
Topics
Comments
  • DEE
    Re: Compensation Payouts Held in Trust
    How do you go about if your child has attained the age of 18 years and the lawyer handling the case has refused any…
    15 October 2017
  • Ant
    Re: 'No-Win, No-Fee' - Too Good to be True?
    I was pressurised into buying a product that was sold to me with the understanding I had a 14 day cool off period.…
    4 October 2017
  • Retired61
    Re: What Can You Claim For?
    Many thanks for your reply. Even if the builders have a right to access to my property (which I dispute), should they not have to apply…
    15 November 2016
  • CompensationCulture
    Re: Problems with Personal Injury Claims
    shunty - Your Question:My car got shunted at a roundabout by a driver who came up the motorway slipway too fast. The…
    2 November 2016
  • shunty
    Re: Problems with Personal Injury Claims
    My car got shunted at a roundabout by a driver who came up the motorway slipway too fast. The driver admitted liability.…
    1 November 2016
  • Rainey Smith
    Re: The Victim Contact Scheme
    What would a huge increase in relevant traffic mean for your business? If I could greatly increase the amount of customers who are…
    16 June 2016
  • CompensationCulture
    Re: What Can You Claim For?
    Retired61 - Your Question:Without prejudice. Builders working next door have removed and killed most of a beautiful Virginia creeper on…
    14 June 2016
  • Retired61
    Re: What Can You Claim For?
    Without prejudice. Builders working next door have removed and killed most of a beautiful Virginia creeper on the wall they are working…
    13 June 2016
  • Nusrat Jabeen
    Re: Damages Under the Human Rights Act
    Social services forced me to leave my house , police were also used . When I did complaint against this incident , social…
    26 July 2015
  • Liza Morris
    Re: The Victim Contact Scheme
    We are Internet Marketing experts who can help you answer these questions, drive mass traffic to your site, and dramatically increase…
    29 August 2014